Authorization

Registration

Forgot password?


Forgot password

  • English version
  • Русская версия
EGF
The European Geopolitical Forum

Thursday 12 June 2025

  • Registration
  • Login
  • About
    • Who we are
    • What we do
    • Issues we work on
    • EGF in Press
    • What makes us different?
    • Staff
    • Affiliated Experts
    • Why is geopolitics important?
    • Expert Presentations
    • EGF Partners
    • Contact Us
  • Forum
    • In progress
    • Archive
    • Terms & Rules
    • Registration
    • Help
  • Experts
  • Context
    • News
    • Publications
    • Events
    • Documents
    • Maps
    • Members Area
    • Book reviews
  • EGF Shop

Advanced Search

Context
News Clean energy surges globally, but has yet to replace fossil fuels: Report

Clean sources accounted for more than 40 percent of electricity production last year for the first time.

  • April 8, 2025
Publications Growing Footprint of the Turkish Capital in China

Vusal GULIYEV By Vusal GULIYEV, Policy Advisor at the Center of Analysis of International Relations and Head of Shanghai Office at AZEGLOB Consulting Group

Over the past three decades, Turkish investment in China has steadily expanded, covering sectors such as energy, manufacturing, retail, and food. Despite certain market challenges, companies like Aksa and TAB Gıda have found scalable success. Backed by institutional frameworks, Türkiye’s strategic pivot to Asia continues to strengthen and diversify its economic relationship with China’s vast and growing market.
Economic relations between Türkiye and China have expanded considerably over the past three decades, evolving beyond trade to encompass mutual investment. While Chinese investments in Türkiye have typically drawn more attention, Turkish capital flowing into China has also steadily increased. Although Turkish investments remain less diversified and extensive than their Chinese counterparts, several Turkish companies have made notable contributions across multiple sectors. Nevertheless, China’s vast consumer base and industrial ecosystem have long been seen as a strategic target for Turkish businesses seeking to enhance their global reach. READ MORE

  • April 4, 2025
News What’s happening to US-European relations?

There are divisions over NATO, the future of Greenland, trade and the Russia-Ukraine war.

  • April 1, 2025
News Why is Trump ‘very angry’ with Putin and who will secondary tariffs hurt?

Putin’s refusal to accept Zelenskyy’s legitimacy has upset Trump. His threatened sanctions could unsettle oil markets.

  • April 1, 2025
News Moldova expels three Russian diplomats, Moscow promises to retaliate

Chisinau calls trio personae non gratae after accusing embassy of helping convicted lawmaker escape to Transnistria.

  • April 1, 2025
News France’s far-right Marine Le Pen banned from 2027 presidential election

A French court found Marine Le Pen guilty of embezzlement, ordering a five-year ban on running for office and two years of electronic tracking. Her far-right National Rally party must now decide on a new candidate for the 2027 presidential elections.

  • April 1, 2025
Publications Strategic pathways toward a credible endgame for Ukraine

Elkhan Nuriyev By Elkhan NURIYEV, PhD, Senior Fellow at the Mathias Corvinus Collegium Foundation in Budapest and Senior Fellow at the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation in Berlin

Just over two months into U.S. President Donald Trump’s second term, new uncertainties have begun to reshape the West’s approach toward the war in Ukraine. As the conflict grinds through its third year, signs of strategic drift have emerged across Western capitals. With battlefield momentum stalled, political divisions deepening, and public fatigue rising, the West now faces a narrowing window to reassess its goals—or risk drifting toward a scenario of prolonged stalemate and fractured unity. While former president Joe Biden framed the war as a broader fight for democracy and pledged open–ended support to Kyiv, Trump’s foreign policy instincts emphasize burden sharing, cost efficiency, and transactional diplomacy. These principles are already shaping Washington’s posture. Military aid packages have slowed, public rhetoric has shifted toward ending the war “quickly,” and U.S. diplomatic overtures increasingly hint at conditional support rather than blank checks. READ MORE

  • March 27, 2025
Publications US–Russia Talks: Implications for Armenia–Azerbaijan Negotiations

Benyamin Poghosyan By Benyamin POGHOSYAN, PhD, Senior Research Fellow at the APRI Armenia


The promise to end the war in Ukraine quickly was one of Donald J. Trump’s main campaign pledges. Upon returning to the White House in January 2025, the president began taking steps toward this goal. The world witnessed a whirlwind of negotiations: face-to-face meetings between Mr. Trump’s envoy, Steven Witkoff, and Russian President Vladimir Putin; multiple phone calls between Mr. Trump and Presidents Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky; direct US–Russia and US–Ukraine talks in Saudi Arabia; and a tense meeting in the Oval Office with Mr. Zelensky.
As a result, Russia and Ukraine agreed to suspend attacks on each other’s energy infrastructure for one month. Negotiations are now underway for a broader ceasefire. It is too early to assess the likelihood of a complete and lasting ceasefire — let alone the prospects for a comprehensive peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine. READ MORE

  • March 27, 2025
1 ... 6 7 8 ... 1254
Choose region

© 2006—2025 European Geopolitical Forum

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact us