Authorization

Registration

Forgot password?


Forgot password

  • English version
  • Русская версия
EGF
The European Geopolitical Forum

Saturday 22 November 2025

  • Registration
  • Login
  • About
    • Who we are
    • What we do
    • Issues we work on
    • EGF in Press
    • What makes us different?
    • Staff
    • Affiliated Experts
    • Why is geopolitics important?
    • Expert Presentations
    • EGF Partners
    • Contact Us
  • Forum
    • In progress
    • Archive
    • Terms & Rules
    • Registration
    • Help
  • Experts
  • Context
    • News
    • Publications
    • Events
    • Documents
    • Maps
    • Members Area
    • Book reviews
  • EGF Shop

Advanced Search

Discussion
  • In Progress
  • Archive
Armenia's choice of the Eurasian Union: A stunning end to its European integration?

George Vlad Niculescu,
Head of Research, The European Geopolitical Forum


The announcement at the beginning of September 2013, in Moscow, by President Serzh Sargsyan of Armenia's decision to join the Russia-led Eurasian Customs Union (ECU) apparently took many by surprise. Firstly, because in July 2013 Armenia concluded a lengthy four years negotiation on essential agreements, meant to upgrade its ties with the European Union (EU), which would be incompatible with joining the ECU. Secondly, because until recently (i.e. the run-up to the Vilnius Eastern Partnership summit to be held this fall) enlargement didn't seem a top priority for the ECU, the focus being more on making the customs union mechanisms effectively work for the existing membership. READ MORE

  • Friday, 27 September 2013, 10:54
Russian Problem: Russia's Place in the World - an Attempt at Historical and Geopolitical Analysis

by Prof. Andrej Kreutz,
EGF adviser for Trans-Atlantic security


A Long Western Debate and its Political Consequences
Although Russia has been part of the European system since the Westphalian Treaty of 1648, and after its victory in the Northern War with Sweden and the Nystad Treaty in 1721 started to be seen as of he major powers on the continent, both its internal nature and its role in international politics have often suffered Western doubts and uncertainties. READ MORE

  • Thursday, 19 September 2013, 12:42
Russia’s Soft Power: Does Moscow have any chance to achieve it?

by Prof. Andrej Kreutz,
EGF adviser for Trans-Atlantic security


The issue of soft power and its use in international relations, the concept of attracting and coopting rather than use of direct or indirect coercion as a means of persuasion, was introduced to present use by American scholar Joseph S Nye Jr. in 2002. However, both its concept and its practical use were in fact not new. Both modern and past history provides numerous examples of its previous applications. READ MORE

  • Friday, 21 June 2013, 15:49
South Stream Shapes European Energy Security, Nabucco Falls Behind

13.pngBy Igor Alexeev
Russian journalist and blogger for Strategic Culture Foundation and Route Magazine. He writes on the oil and gas sector, Eurasian energy security and shipping industries in the Arctic.

South Stream is an ambitious endeavor of Russia’s energy giant Gazprom to get direct access to the EU energy market. It is portrayed and criticized by some politicians in Europe as a “dangerous” gateway to a broader economic relationship with Moscow. Remarkably enough, Bulgaria, Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia and Hungary have one-by-one opted for the project.
The South Stream Fact Sheet

  • Gas pipeline will be 1455 km long in Southern and Central Europe;
  • 8500 people will be employed in its construction, with 770 at the operational level;
  • Eight compression stations are to be set up in the main transit countries;
  • The South Stream planned transport capacity may reach 63 billion cubic meters;
  • The overall cost of the project is approximately $39 billion.

READ MORE

  • Tuesday, 7 May 2013, 07:57
NATO Strategic Operations in Post-Cold War Security Point to the Core Role of Partnerships in the Way Forward

NATO logo.jpg By George Niculescu,
Head of Research, The European Geopolitical Forum


Introduction
Since the end of the Cold War, the future of NATO has been a topic for debate among politicians, bureaucrats, scholars and journalists familiar with the European and global security issues. NATO’s future role within the newly evolving global security structure has been a particularly relevant topic for such debates. The North Atlantic Alliance has so far proven itself to be a flexible enough entity in relation to adapting itself to post-Cold War security realities in order to survive the bygone era of the 20th Century. Both political and military leaders of the Alliance have understood the key lesson learned from the fall in relevance of the Warsaw Pact after the collapse of the communism in Central-Eastern Europe: the continuous adaptation of NATO to the new security challenges is the only viable alternative to the Alliance’s disappearance from the geostrategic map. READ MORE

  • Tuesday, 7 May 2013, 07:56
Regional Integration as a Conflict Management Strategy in the Balkans and South Caucasus

By Anna Ohanyan,
EGF Affiliated Expert on South Caucasus region building


There is much enthusiasm among researchers and policymakers alike concerning the pacifying effects of trade and broader interdependence among states. The European Union is an often cited example of greater regional integration as a way to enhance peace and security among neighboring states. This comparative regional study draws from the cases of the Balkans and South Caucasus in order (1) to offer a descriptive account of patterns and processes of regionalism in politically divided conflict areas, and (2) to examine the extent to which such regional engagement can positively affect ongoing conflict management efforts in a given conflict region. The study advocates promoting regional structures as a new and potentially effective approach to peace-building and security enhancement, toward managing the many 'frozen conflicts' both in the Balkans as well as in the South Caucasus. READ MORE

  • Friday, 8 February 2013, 10:40
  • 2 comments
The OSCE’s ‘Asia Pivot’? Implications of the Mongolian Accession

Paul Pryce
EGF Affiliated Expert on Conflict Management and the OSCE Institutions


On November 21st, 2012, a surprising announcement was made in Vienna. Mongolia had acceded as the 57th participating State of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), the world’s largest regional security organization. Mongolia has effectively been an observer state since 2004, involved in the OSCE’s Asian Partners for Cooperation together with Japan, South Korea, Thailand, and Afghanistan. Contributing to the surprise of the announcement, the country’s bid for full participation in the work of the OSCE had only come in late October 2011, when the Lithuanian Chairmanship received a formal letter from the Mongolian government stating their willingness to comply fully with the terms of the Helsinki Final Act, the Charter of Paris for a New Europe, and other documents integral to the OSCE. Click here to read more.

  • Wednesday, 19 December 2012, 13:21
  • 2 comments
China and the Iranian Nuclear Crisis: Between Ambiguities and Interests

Djallil Lounnas,
EGF Affiliated Expert with focus on Insurgency and Trans-national radicalism in North Africa and Sahel-Sahara


This article analyses, the complex relationship between Tehran, Beijing and Washington on the Iranian nuclear issue. Indeed, China’ policy towards Iran has often been described as ambiguous, in supporting Washington, on the one hand, while protecting Tehran, on the other hand. In this article, we argue that, in fact, Beijing policy vis-a-vis Tehran depends on the state of its relationships with Washington. Indeed, a closer analysis shows that China is using Iran as a bargaining chip with the United States on, among others, two key security issues, i.e., Taiwan and the oil supply. The guarantee of a secured oil supply from the Middle-East in addition to a comprehensive policy of the US with regard to Chinese security interests in Taiwan as well as the use of smart sanctions against Tehran, which would thus take into account, to a certain extent, Beijing economic interests in Iran, are, indeed, the guarantee of Beijing’ support to the US policy towards Iran. Click here to read more.

  • Friday, 6 July 2012, 05:01
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Choose region

Context

  • News US to slash tariffs on Switzerland to 15% from crippling 39%
  • Publications TRIPP/Zangezur Corridor Must Serve both Peace and Connectivity
More

© 2006—2025 European Geopolitical Forum

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact us